WAS · RB · #22 · Arizona; New Mexico; Alabama State · 2 yrs exp
Earning more snaps.
Based on his last 2 games vs. the 2 before.
| Week | Opp | Snaps | Snap % | Tgt | Tgt % | Rec | Rec yds | Car | Rush yds | RZ tgt | RZ car | GL opp | -10 tgt | Close tgt | TD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | PHI | 25 | 36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 13 | 29 | 0 | 2.9 | |||||
| 17 | DAL | 28 | 64% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 11 | 105 | 2 | 22.5 | |||||
| 16 | PHI | 11 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 8 | 25 | 1 | 8.5 | |||||
| 15 | NYG | 32 | 52% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 18 | 96 | 1 | 15.6 | |||||
| 14 | MIN | 10 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 7 | 32 | 0 | 3.2 | |||||
| 13 | DEN | 13 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 2 | |||||
| 11 | MIA | 18 | 27% | 1 | 3.4% | 1 | 5 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 4.3 | |||||
| 10 | DET | 24 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 11 | 30 | 0 | 3 | |||||
| 9 | SEA | 30 | 46% | 1 | 4.8% | 1 | 3 | 12 | 38 | 0 | 5.1 | |||||
| 8 | KC | 30 | 57% | 1 | 3.3% | 0 | 0 | 9 | 25 | 0 | 2.5 | |||||
| 7 | DAL | 33 | 49% | 2 | 6.5% | 1 | -1 | 13 | 33 | 0 | 4.2 | |||||
| 6 | CHI | 43 | 66% | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 7 | 17 | 61 | 0 | 5.8 | |||||
| 5 | LAC | 28 | 47% | 2 | 8.7% | 2 | 39 | 14 | 111 | 2 | 27 | |||||
| 4 | ATL | 20 | 35% | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 10 | 7 | 47 | 0 | 7.7 | |||||
| 3 | LV | 23 | 40% | 1 | 5.6% | 1 | 5 | 8 | 26 | 1 | 10.1 | |||||
| 2 | GB | 15 | 22% | 1 | 2.5% | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 1.7 | |||||
| 1 | NYG | 23 | 33% | 1 | 3.4% | 0 | 0 | 10 | 82 | 1 | 14.2 |
“—” means nflverse has no snap record for that game. Games with snaps but no stat line had zero passing, rushing and receiving stats. RZ = inside the opponent 20, GL = inside the 5, counted from nflverse play-by-play (regular season, excluding two-point tries). -10 = team down 10+ at the snap; Close = within 7 points either way. Loading red zone usage…
The shaded band marks the most recent 2 games used in the trend comparison.
Share of team offensive snaps (%)
Volume per game
PPR fantasy points and scrimmage yards
Targets + carries per game
Per-game averages · recent Wks 17, 18 · previous Wks 15, 16
| Metric | Previous | Last 2 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap share | 36% | 50% | +14 |
| Offensive snaps | 21.5 | 26.5 | +5 |
| Targets | 0 | 0 | ±0 |
| Target share | 0% | 0% | ±0 |
| Receptions | 0 | 0 | ±0 |
| Receiving yards | 0 | 0 | ±0 |
| Carries | 13 | 12 | −1 |
| Rushing yards | 60.5 | 67 | +6.5 |
| Opportunities | 13 | 12 | −1 |
| PPR points | 12.1 | 12.7 | +0.6 |
| Week | Opp | Snaps | Snap % | Tgt | Tgt % | Rec | Rec yds | Car | Rush yds | RZ tgt | RZ car | GL opp | -10 tgt | Close tgt | TD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | PHI | 25 | 36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 13 | 29 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.9 |
| 17 | DAL | 28 | 64% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 11 | 105 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 22.5 |
| 16 | PHI | 11 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 8 | 25 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.5 |
| 15 | NYG | 32 | 52% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 18 | 96 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15.6 |
| 14 | MIN | 10 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 7 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 |
| 13 | DEN | 13 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 11 | MIA | 18 | 27% | 1 | 3.4% | 1 | 5 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.3 |
| 10 | DET | 24 | 44% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 11 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 9 | SEA | 30 | 46% | 1 | 4.8% | 1 | 3 | 12 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.1 |
| 8 | KC | 30 | 57% | 1 | 3.3% | 0 | 0 | 9 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 |
| 7 | DAL | 33 | 49% | 2 | 6.5% | 1 | -1 | 13 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.2 |
| 6 | CHI | 43 | 66% | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 7 | 17 | 61 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5.8 |
| 5 | LAC | 28 | 47% | 2 | 8.7% | 2 | 39 | 14 | 111 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 27 |
| 4 | ATL | 20 | 35% | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 10 | 7 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.7 |
| 3 | LV | 23 | 40% | 1 | 5.6% | 1 | 5 | 8 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10.1 |
| 2 | GB | 15 | 22% | 1 | 2.5% | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.7 |
| 1 | NYG | 23 | 33% | 1 | 3.4% | 0 | 0 | 10 | 82 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14.2 |
“—” means nflverse has no snap record for that game. Games with snaps but no stat line had zero passing, rushing and receiving stats. RZ = inside the opponent 20, GL = inside the 5, counted from nflverse play-by-play (regular season, excluding two-point tries). -10 = team down 10+ at the snap; Close = within 7 points either way.
Season totals. Close game = within 7 points either way at the snap.
4for4 only publishes current-season (2026) red zone stats.
ESPN (opens in a new tab)Commanders.com (opens in a new tab)Hogs Haven (opens in a new tab)
The Washington Commanders placed running back Jacory Croskey-Merritt on injured reserve, sidelining their starting back for at least four games.
Injury / practice· John Keim· Read on ESPN Commanders (opens in a new tab)
Croskey-Merritt had already been ruled out for Monday's game against the 49ers, but his move to IR ensures that he'll miss at least an additional three contests beyond that. With Croskey-Merritt sidelined through Week 10, Rachaad White looks on track to serve as the Commanders' top option out of the backfield in the interim, while Austin Ekeler and Jeremy McNichols are on hand in complementary roles.
Injury / practice
Commanders running back Jacory Croskey-Merritt won't play against the 49ers because of a groin injury, coach Dan Quinn said.
Injury / practice· John Keim· Read on ESPN Commanders (opens in a new tab)
Croskey-Merritt was unable to practice all week due to a groin injury, and he's now been officially ruled out for Monday night's game. The statuses of Rachaad White (shoulder) and Austin Ekeler (chest) will be known once the Commanders announce their injury designations on Saturday's practice report. Washington is on a bye for Week 7, so Croskey-Merritt will have more time to recover from his injury before the Commanders' Week 8 tilt against the Eagles on Sunday, Nov. 1.
Injury / practice
Croskey-Merritt will end up missing all three Week 6 practices while recovering from a groin injury, and it wouldn't be surprising to see him ruled out by the Commanders once the team submits its injury designations following Saturday's session. Rachaad White (shoulder) and Austin Ekeler (chest) are also both working through injuries, so the Commanders may have to dip into their practice squad and elevate one or both of Craig Reynolds or Devin Neal for Monday night's contest.
Injury / practice
Croskey-Merritt has yet to practice this week due to a groin injury that also impacted his on-field work last week. He was able to suit up last Sunday versus the Giants, handling a 36 percent snap share and accounting for 82 yards and one touchdown on his 11 carries. Saturday's session likely will be key for Croskey-Merritt's odds to suit up Monday at San Francisco, but if he's inhibited or sidelined for Week 6, Rachaad White (shoulder, LP on Friday) and Austin Ekeler (chest, LP) would be the primary candidates to man the Commanders backfield.
Injury / practice
After sitting out Thursday's practice due to the groin issue, Croskey-Merritt isn't looking great for Monday's matchup with the 49ers. An absence would put Rachaad White and Austin Ekeler in larger roles, with RB Craig Reynolds also a candidate to take some snaps if he's called up from the practice squad.
Injury / practice
Croskey-Merritt logged two limited practices during Week 5 prep due to a groin issue and still suited up this past Sunday against the Giants, turning his 11 carries into 82 yards and one touchdown. As a result, his absence Thursday could be more for maintenance than anything, but his status nonetheless will be watched closely in advance of Monday's game at San Francisco.
Injury / practice